Militaries are utilising AI in a number of ways, including the development of autonomous weapons systems, the use of drones for missile strikes and reconnaissance, and cyberwarfare. Drones incorporating AI capabilities may function independently and make judgements without assistance from humans. UAVs are the most obvious examples of autonomous weapons systems that may function without human intervention, potentially enhancing the speed and effectiveness of military operations. AI is also being utilised to enhance cyber defence systems, assisting in the prevention of cyberattacks and maintaining the security of important military data.

The way wars are fought and won is changing because of AI. Today’s  AI’s sophisticated capabilities are enabling militaries to function more effectively and efficiently, ushering in a new era of warfare. Militaries are  getting new tools and approaches to handle the challenges of modern combat thanks to the employment of AI in drones, autonomous weapons systems, and cyberwarfare. 

Drone use is one of the most significant applications of artificial intelligence in the military. Drones having AI capabilities may function independently and make judgements without assistance from humans. Drones are perfect for reconnaissance and missile strikes because AI enables them to fly autonomously, navigate challenging situations, and avoid obstructions. Drones can detect and track targets by analysing data and making judgements based on that analysis with the aid of AI.

The use of AI in drones has several benefits for military operations. Since drones can fly for longer periods of time and cover more land than regular aircraft, efficiency is one of the biggest benefits. They can therefore acquire data more rapidly and comprehensively than human pilots. AI also enables autonomous decision-making for drones, eliminating the need for human oversight. This may result in quicker reaction times and less danger to human pilots. As AI can evaluate data and make judgements based on that data, it can help identify and track targets more precisely, which is another benefit of utilising AI in drones. Furthermore, drones with sophisticated AI can now independently strike targets, something which has been a cause for concern in recent years. 

The use of AI in unmanned vehicles doesn’t just apply to aerial vehicles. land and sea vehicles are also beginning to use AI. Unmanned ground vehicles (UGV) and unmanned surface vehicles (USV) are beginning to use AI not only for target recognition, but also for swarm operations. This can be labelled as swarm intelligence, where unmanned vehicles can communicate, navigate and perform combat operations in unison, using the shared data to operate as efficiently as possible. Of course, this swarm capability is also a trend which is prevalent in UAVs, such as the STM Kargu.

5th gen fighters are using AI to increase both combat effectiveness and pilot safety. AI enables the data picked up by an assortment of sensors to be quickly assessed and presented to the pilot for unparalleled situational awareness. With the advent of loyal wingman projects, the use of AI in fighter jets will become even more important, as multiple UAVs will need to communicate with a fighter jet in dynamic and dangerous situations, both providing physical protection and enhanced awareness of threats. Fighter jets such as the F-35 and upcoming TFX can land autonomously in the event where a pilot passes out.

The Baykar Bayraktar Kizilelma drone presents a brand new use case for sophisticated AI. Unlike other drones, the Kizilelma is much more like a fighter jet. Not only can it target other aircraft, but it can also perform aggressive manoeuvres. It will be able to operate in GPS denied airspace and under electronic warfare attacks. Therefore, it will heavily rely on AI for operations in areas where communications are cut.

AI is used in a variety of weapon systems such as close range air defence systems, tank turrets and RCWS. The use of AI in such systems enables for quick and accurate targeting of enemy vehicles and troops. The AI can facilitate the tracking of targets, including trajectory predictions based on target speed and direction. 

AI is also employed in cyberwarfare to thwart cyberattacks and safeguard vital military data. Artificial intelligence (AI)-powered systems can be used to quickly identify and respond to cyberthreats, including seeing and thwarting prospective assaults before they can do any harm. AI can also be used to analyse vast amounts of data and spot trends, potentially revealing network weaknesses. AI can also be used to develop “honeypots” or fake assets in order to divert attackers’ attention away from the real valuable assets.

A variety of benefits for military operations come from the employment of AI in cyberwarfare. Increased security is one of the biggest benefits because AI-powered systems can identify and address cyber threats instantly. As a result, potential assaults can be recognised and countered before they have a chance to cause harm, maintaining the security of important military data. Additionally, the use of AI in cyberwarfare enables quicker response times because AI systems can quickly spot patterns in massive amounts of data and evaluate them for possible network flaws.

Future military applications of AI are probably going to be substantially more sophisticated as AI technology develops. AI-powered systems might be utilised, for instance, to command entire battlefields and make tactical decisions in real-time. Additionally, as cyberattacks get more sophisticated, the use of AI in cyberwarfare is anticipated to become more prevalent. 

The post From Drones to Cyber Warfare: The Military Applications of AI first appeared on DefenceHub.

Let’s begin by giving a quick overview of RFID technology. Radio waves are used in the technology known as RFID, or radio frequency identification, to communicate between a reader and a tag. Credit cards, passports, and key fobs are just a few examples of the products that may have these tags, commonly referred to as RFID chips. Data transfers, including those involving payment information or personal data, are made possible by communication between the reader and the tag.

As the name implies, RFID wallets are wallets that are made to prevent RFID skimming of your credit and debit cards. A sort of electronic pickpocketing known as RFID skimming involves a criminal using a gadget to read and steal the data contained on RFID chips. The unique lining or substance used in RFID wallets blocks the radio signals, preventing skimming from taking place.

This article’s goal is to make RFID technology and its applications more clear to you, so you can decide whether RFID wallets are worthwhile for you. We will examine the advantages and disadvantages of RFID wallets, consider alternatives, and help you understand the degree of security that RFID wallets provide. Let’s get started and provide you the information you need to decide if an RFID wallet is the correct choice for you.

It’s critical to first comprehend the operation of RFID technology in order to properly comprehend the advantages and disadvantages of RFID wallets.

Synopsis of the operations of RFID technology:

Radio waves are used in RFID technology to transmit data between a reader and a tag. A tiny amount of data, such as a unique identifying number or personal details, are stored on the tag, also known as an RFID chip. The RFID reader’s radio waves are utilised to energise the chip in the tag and enable data transmission when it is in close contact to the reader. This method of RFID is referred to as “passive” because the tag doesn’t require its own power source.

Another type of RFID technology is “active,” where the tag has its own power source and can communicate with the reader across a greater distance. This technology can be used in a warehouse or retail setting and is often utilised in logistics and inventory management.

Common applications for RFID technology:

Retail, transportation, and the healthcare sectors are just a few of the industries that employ RFID technology. Among the widespread applications of RFID technology are:

• Electronic collecting of tolls (EZ-Pass)
• Inventory control and monitoring (warehouse, retail)
• Access management (building access, event ticketing)
• Cashless transaction (credit and debit cards, mobile payments)
• Animal recognition (livestock, pets)

RFID technology risks: Although it offers many advantages and practical applications, RFID technology also has some risks. RFID skimming, in which a criminal uses a device to read and steal the data held on RFID chips, is one of the key threats. If RFID chips are not adequately protected, there is also the potential that unauthorised persons could read the personal information on the chips.
It’s critical to be aware of these threats and take precautions to safeguard both your personal data and yourself.

Keep in mind the technology involved, the typical applications, and the potential concerns as we continue to examine RFID wallets. This will enable you to decide whether an RFID wallet is suitable for you in a more informed manner.

RFID wallet benefits include:

RFID wallets are made to shield your credit and debit cards against RFID skimming, a sort of electronic pickpocketing, as was before described. RFID wallets have a specific lining or substance that makes it considerably more challenging for thieves to obtain your personal information.

Convenience and usability: RFID wallets are extremely practical and simple to operate. You may now make purchases without searching for cash or fiddling with your cards thanks to contactless payments. This capability is becoming more widespread and a prerequisite for rapid and simple transactions everywhere.

RFID wallet disadvantages include:

Due to the additional expense of the particular lining or material that provides RFID protection, RFID wallets may be more expensive than regular wallets.

Limited compatibility with specific card kinds: Some RFID wallets might not be compatible with specific card types, including transit or hotel key cards. This means that in order to use the card, you might need to take it out of your RFID wallet.

Protection against other types of identity theft is limited. While RFID wallets offer defence against RFID skimming, they do not offer any defence against other types of theft, such as phishing scams.  It’s crucial to remember that keeping your personal information private involves more than just RFID wallets. 

In the end, it’s up to you to determine whether the extra benefits worth the extra expense.

Conclusion

While RFID wallets provide benefits such defence against RFID skimming, convenience, and ease of use, they also cost significantly more than normal wallets.

Last advice on whether RFID wallets are worthwhile:

Your particular demands and goals will ultimately determine whether or not an RFID wallet is worthwhile for you. An RFID wallet might be a decent option for you if you frequently make contactless payments and are concerned about the possibility of RFID skimming. An RFID wallet might not be required, though, if you don’t own contactless cards.

If you do consider purchasing a RFID wallet then consider the DefenceHub T-100, available at our store

Additional reading materials include:

There are plenty further resources available if you’re interested in learning more about RFID technology and how to safeguard yourself from RFID skimming. Information about identity theft protection and prevention may be found on websites like the Federal Trade Commission’s and the Identity Theft Resource Center’s. You can also ask your bank or credit card company whether they provide RFID protection services to determine if they do.

List of references consulted for this article:

“What is RFID? How RFID Works and RFID Technology” RFID Journal, https://www.rfidjournal.com/rfid/what-is-rfid
“RFID Skimming: What You Need to Know” Federal Trade Commission, https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/blog/rfid-skimming-what-you-need-know
“RFID Blocking Wallet: Is it worth it?” Identity Theft Resource Center, www.idtheftcenter.org/rfid-blocking-wallet-worth-it
“RFID Chip Credit Card: What You Need to Know” Bankrate, https://www.bankrate.com/banking/credit-cards/rfid-chip-credit-cards/
“RFID wallets – what you need to know” Norton, https://us.norton.com/internetsecurity-emerging-threats-rfid-wallets-what-you-need-to-know.html

The post RFID Protection: Are RFID Wallets a Must-Have for Today’s World? first appeared on DefenceHub.

Revealed at SAHA Expo 2022, the RUAV-724 has some surprisingly impressive specifications and innovative features.

Powered by a turbojet engine, the sleek, cruise missile-like RUAV-724 can travel at a maximum speed of 1,000 km/h. This is significantly faster than current autonomous delivery vehicles and slightly faster than most cargo jets. It will have a cargo capacity of 150 kg. This makes it ideal for the rapid delivery of critical components or weapons. Its range is up to 2,500 km, meaning that it would be capable of resupplying missions deep into contested territory.

The RUAV-724 is capable of vertical take-off with an added booster. This enables deliveries to be dispatched from within tight spaces, such as city streets or naval vessels. This is similar to many kamikaze drones, which use a booster to take off before switching to their main engine. Sortie Cargo has emphasised that the RUAV-724 has an advanced braking system which eliminates the need for a long landing strip.

One of the key features of the RUAV-724 is that it can drop cargo with a parachute. This is a game changer for the resupply of special forces units that are deep in enemy territory or troops who need to be resupplied in rugged terrain. Due to the relatively low cost and the fact that there is no risk of losing pilots, this aircraft is perfect for light cargo delivery in dangerous airspace. It also opens up the possibility for new tactics. For instance, infiltration teams can enter hostile territory without weapons or other gear. When the time comes, they can be quickly and safely supplied by airdrops from the RUAV-724.

All in all, the RUAV-724 is an innovative concept. It combines the speed and appearance of a cruise missile with the reusability and autonomous features of a UAV, yet it functions as a small cargo aircraft. Italy has already signed a contract. The smaller Sortie Cargo RUAV-A has been successfully tested. Meanwhile, Turkey plans to host flight tests of the 6-metre RUAV-724 later in the year.

The post The RUAV-724 is a fascinating fast autonomous cargo concept first appeared on DefenceHub.

Called Tayfun (Typhoon), the new missile is a short range ballistic missile (SRBM). Built by Roketsan, it joins a growing family of longer range solutions for the Turkish Armed Forces.

Though the unveiling of the Tayfun came as surprise, it was expected that Roketsan would release an evolution of the existing Bora, which had an export version named Khan with a maximum range limited to 280 km. According to CNN Türk the Tayfun successfully hit a target 561 kilometres away, just over twice the range of the Khan tactical ballistic missile. The maximum range is classified, but is expected to be just under 1000 kilometres, typical of SRBMs

An interesting point about the Tayfun is that it may be optimized to hit naval vessels. Several years ago, Turkish defence officials had stated that a second iteration of the Bora was being developed. It was said that the Bora II would not only have a range in excess of 500 km, but would also be capable of striking ships. It is almost certain that “Tayfun” is the new name for the Bora II and that the name which is the Turkish translation of “typhoon” is in reference to its naval attack capabilities.

As the Tayfun has only been officially revealed today, it will continue to be shrouded in mystery for a while. Though it can be speculated that it will have mid-course maneuvering and a quasi-ballistic trajectory similar to the Bora, with a much higher terminal speed. As a strategic weapon, it is unlikely that specifications and capabilities will be fully released to the public.

The post Türkiye tests mysterious Tayfun missile first appeared on DefenceHub.

The Altay tank project was launched in 2007. Intended to replace some of the Turkish army’s aging tanks such as M60s, the Altay is among the only 4th gen main battle tanks. With its advanced fire control system, boron carbide composite armor and Akkor hard-kill APS, the Altay tank is a big step up from current tanks in the Turkish inventory, including the Leopard 2.

In 2018 the German government decided to place an embargo on arms exports to Turkey. As a result, the MTU 1500hp engines that were supposed to power the Altay could not be acquired. This embargo came into place just as the project was being prepared for serial production. Since then, it has been 4 years. Efforts to produce a domestic 1500hp engine have been ongoing, though creating a reliable engine of this power output is not an easy task for a country that is new to producing engines.

Rumours of a South Korean power pack for the Altay started circulating in 2021. These were followed by official announcements soon after. Both sides have confirmed that the Hyundai Doosan Infracore DV27K engine and SNT Dynamics EST15K transmissions have been approved for integration in prototypes.

Now the Seoul office of the Turkish Investment Agency has stated that a contract will be signed soon for the mass production of the Korean engines and transmissions, thus paving the way for the mass production of the Altay tank. Several modifications are expected to be made before mass production commences next year.

Though the vulnerability of tanks has been exposed in recent conflicts, Turkey, like all major militaries is pressing on with its next-generation tank project. The Altay has been one of the most hotly anticipated projects of the Turkish defence industry. As a long-running major project that will transform an aging fleet, there is no going back. With the engines and transmissions almost ready, the Altay could finally enter the inventory as early as next year, ending a long and arduous saga for the Turkish military and defence industry.

The post Altay Tank Engine Deal Set to be Signed first appeared on DefenceHub.

A tweet by Alex Hollings highlights the disparity between the F-35 and Su-57 production lines. In the top image, a single Su-57 can be seen in what appears to be a much slower production line. This indicates issues with parts supplies or funding. It also suggests that Russia may find the Su-57’s stealth capabilities unsatisfactory, thus making mass production risky. In comparison, the F-35 production line appears to be in full swing.

Russia may be giving up on the Su-57, instead focusing on its other 5th gen fighter, the Su-75 ‘Checkmate’. The Su-57, though more agile than the single-engine F-35, has a much higher radar cross-section and significantly less advanced electronics. It was essentially Russia’s attempt at making a competitor to the F-22. Meanwhile, the upcoming Su-75 is a single-engine fighter that is almost certainly a response to the F-35.

Russia seeks to emulate the F-35’s mass production with the introduction of the Su-75. Though the F-35 program had a range of hiccups, the United States is content with its “flying computer”. As the replacement for not only the F-16, but F/A-18, A-10 and others, the F-35 is the jack of all trades. Part of the reason for this is cost reduction. It is far cheaper to design a single aircraft capable of all missions rather than designing multiple specialised aircraft. As aircraft rely increasingly on their electronics, beyond-visual range weapons and stealth, the importance of other factors such as speed and agility have decreased.

Russia’s archic electronics won’t be sufficient in order to make the Su-75 a true competitor to the F-35. Despite declarations that local parts will be used, it is likely that Russia will pursue Chinese technology instead. As Russia will probably secure a deal for Chinese components, stealth would be the primary focus for Sukhoi.

Russia’s “artisinal” Su-57 lacks the stealth characteristics and advanced electronics typical of 5th gen fighters. Its low production numbers are a clear indication that Russia is aware of its weaknesses. Coupled with the fact that it is a twin-engine, therefore more expensive to produce and maintain, Russia will presumably double down on making the single-engine Su-75 the ‘saving grace’ of Russian military aviation.

The post What the F-35 and SU-57 production lines can tell us first appeared on DefenceHub.

Iran is no stranger to protests. Significant protests have occurred nearly every year for the past decade, with fatalities reported almost every time. However, the recent protests sparked by the death of Mahsa Amini are different. Though Iranians have protested for democracy and against the hijab ban before, the ferocity of the recent demonstrations is unusually high. The protests are also widespread, sweeping across all major urban centres. As conflicts pop up across Eurasia, it’s easy to see how this unrest could start a new arena in this turbulent period which can only be labelled as the Second Cold War.

What to watch out for

Over 70 casualties have been reported so far. These have been caused by both “less” lethal and lethal weapons. Meaning that not only have tear gas launchers or batons been used with lethal intent but guns have also been used against demonstrators. There are reports of birdshot being used against civilians. Perhaps even more disturbingly, there is a video circulating that shows an AK variant being fired toward protestors. It is likely that the Iranian government will use the internet blackout to its advantage by cutting communications between different urban centres while increasing efforts to quash the protests. This would make it significantly easier to demoralise the public as each town or city can be isolated, thus removing the aspect that this is a nationwide protest.

Though the government hopes to swiftly put an end to protests through brutal force, this could further exacerbate the situation. In fact, it seems like so far it is only making protestors angrier. After all, the protests were caused by an act of police brutality. This begs the question if the protesters do not give up, what will the Iranian government’s next move be?

This could go two ways. The government could make concessions or even have a shake-up of leadership in order to ease the protests. Or, if the protests continue to grow the government may choose to up the ante. If the government sees itself at threat of losing everything, it may begin to retaliate with heavy weapons similar to Assad’s fight to stay in control of Syria.

Iran has close to 200,000 Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps personnel. They are all sworn to protect the nation’s Islamic political system. Not only do they operate heavy land-based weapons, but also a relatively large amount of aircraft including SU-22s, Su-25s and ‘upgraded’ Cobra attack helicopters. This is excessive for a force that is solely meant to protect the political system.

Though the Iranian government knows the risks of using heavy weapons, if it feels like it is losing its grasp it could resort to using the IRGC’s heavy arsenal. Armoured vehicles could patrol the streets, meanwhile, airstrikes could be conducted in cities that are considered strongholds of the resistance, even directly on groups of protestors. Such escalations would indicate the beginning of a civil war. The level of dissonance within the Iranian Armed Forces would heavily influence the probability of a prolonged civil war. However, if chaos breaks out and Iran loses control of its borders, Iran’s adversaries could swiftly arm resistance forces. Iran’s plethora of missiles and drones are aimed at deterring foreign intervention. For this reason, only significant internal chaos would offer an opportunity for risk-free foreign arms supplies.

Overall, the current protests in Iran are highly unlikely to lead to a civil war. Though it is advisable to watch closely, as the potential conflict that could ensue would reshape the Middle East and Central Asia.

The post Could the Protests in Iran be the Beginning of a Civil War? first appeared on DefenceHub.

Washington has long been reluctant to export its bleeding edge aircraft. The F-22 stealth air superiority fighter has an export ban placed on it. Similarly, strategic bombers such as the B-52, B-1 and B-2 have never been exported. Things then changed. Wanting to arm its allies for the next evolution of warfare, the US launched the Joint Strike Fighter program, which resulted in the F-35. By offering what was supposed to be an affordable stealth fighter, the United States not only expected to give their close allies 5th gen capabilities but also bring buyers further into the influence of Washington.

As a replacement for not only the F-16, but also the F-18, Harrier and others, the F-35 is the jack of all trades. Its range of features is impressive. It provides capabilities light years ahead of its predecessors. However, despite its versatility, it has its limitations. Limitations that Australia can’t ignore.

Without aerial refuelling, the F-35A has a reported combat radius of just over 1,090 kilometers (677 miles). This is more than enough for use in overseas coalition operations. However, it isn’t enough for a confrontation with China. Even when taking off from RAAF Base Darwin, the F-35 barely approaches one-quarter of the distance to China’s coastline before needing to turn back to base. Meaning aerial refuelling would be necessary to truly project power. Whether that’s north in support of regional allies, or out in the Pacific, where China is looking to expand its influence. Currently, there are no stealth tanker aircraft. This means a confrontation beyond the combat radius of the F-35 would be unnecessarily risky. Australia must be wary of the combat radius limitations and how it could effectively tie the hands of the RAAF in the worst-case scenario.

The B-21 makes up for the shortfalls of the F-35. It’s expected to have a combat radius of 5,000 kilometers (3,100 miles). This is nearly five times that of the F-35A. To put things into perspective this is enough to reach the Chinese mainland and return back to Australia. This is also enough range to cover a significant portion of the Pacific. Furthermore, it can take advantage of Australia’s land size. In other words, it can cash in on strategic depth if the need arises.

There is also the aspect of payload. The B-21’s payload is unknown, though it would be close to that of the B-2. The B-2 has a payload limit of 18,000 kilograms (40,000 pounds). In contrast, the F-35A has an internal payload capacity of 2,600 kilograms (5,700 pounds). Though the F-35 can carry over 8,000 kilograms (18,000 pounds) when external hardpoints are used, it must be understood that this will significantly increase its radar cross-section. Even if the B-21 were to have half the payload capacity of the B-2, this would still be substantially higher than the F-35.

Australia recently ordered 200 AGM-158C LRASM stealthy long-range anti-ship cruise missiles as part of an extensive $270 billion overhaul. However, according to Lockheed Martin, these missiles cannot be carried internally by F-35s. On the other hand, the current B-2 can carry 16 LRASMs in its internal weapon bay. Meaning that a single B-2 is a threat to an entire carrier strike group. The HALO,  (Hypersonic Air-Launched Offensive Anti-Surface Warfare Missile), is Washington’s answer to Chinese and Russian hypersonic anti-ship missiles. It is expected to be ready by 2028. Like the LRASM, it’s highly unlikely that the F-35 will be able to carry it internally. Therefore, if the Royal Australian Air Force wants a platform that is a true deterrent over the oceans, the B-21 is a logical choice.

With the addition of B-21s, the RAAF’s F-35s will have less of a burden placed on them. F-35s will be better prepared for air superiority. That’s not to say that F-35s will be relegated purely to air-to-air missions, but B-21s would replace the F-35 for long-range, heavy strike or bombardment operations. This would ensure that F-35s don’t get overstretched.

In USAF Secretary Frank Kendall’s recent visit to Canberra, The Strategist enquired about the possibility of Australia joining the B-21 program. The response by Kendall was positive.

“I don’t think that there’s any fundamental limitation on the areas in which we can cooperate, if Australia had a requirement for long-range strike… then we’d be willing to have a conversation with them about that.”

USAF Secretary Frank Kendall to The Strategist

Overall, the B-21 would be an excellent addition to the RAAF. The cost of 12 B-21s would be less than $10 billion USD (not including bases, training and maintenance). The capabilities these aircraft would grant to the Australian Defence Force would far outweigh their cost, which is a small dent in the $270 billion defence overhaul budget. Critics must understand the B-21 is the best possible long-term investment for the ADF. The deployment of 4 USAF B-2s to Australia just weeks ago suggests just how crucial strategic bombers are for the defence of Australia. Australia’s unique geographical position coupled with the incoming storm to the north means Australia can no longer ignore long-range strike options.

This article was submitted to DefenceHub by an author who wishes to remain anonymous

The post Why Australia Needs The B-21 first appeared on DefenceHub.

A collaboration between Aselsan and Roketsan, the Siper will be Turkey’s longest range domestically produced air defence system. It was previously referred to as Hisar-U.

This isn’t the first test firing of the Siper. However, this new footage released by the Defence Industry Agency shows more details than last year’s test. We can see ErAlp (EIRS) search radar in action. There also appears to be no explosion, suggesting that it is a hit-to-kill missile. Furthermore, Ismail Demir, the President of the Defence Industry Agency stated that the Siper has reached a range of 100 kilometers. Initially the Siper Block-I was to have a range of 70 kilometers. It is expected that later iterations of Siper will have a range of 150+ kilometers.

The Siper will join an array of domestic air defence systems, forming the outer layer of Turkey’s air defence network.

• Sungur 8km
• Hisar-A+ 15km
• Hisar-O+ 25km
• Hisar-RF 25km
• Siper Block-I 100km
• Siper Block-II ?

The post Turkey Test Fires Indigenous Long-Range Air Defence System first appeared on DefenceHub.

Canik revealed on Monday that the M2F has passed its qualification tests and is ready for production. The Canik M2F has a much higher fire rate than the M2 QCB’s 450-650, which is standard for M2 Browning-based weapons. At 950 rounds per minute, the M2F is ideal for saturation fire. According to the General Manager at SYS, the MF2 was designed for use on or against aircraft. Therefore a fire rate of under 900 is insufficient.

Current guns (M2’s in the Turkish inventory) have a rate of fire of 550. This is not enough for aircraft. It needs to be over 900. For this reason we raised the rate of fire to 950 on this model

General Manager at SYS, Utku Aral (SYS is the parent company of Canik Arms)

The M2F has been in design for 4 years. Canik is known for its quality guns and the M2F is no different. Built with the aid of advanced coordinate measurement machines, the M2F will be built with precision to ensure maximum reliability.

A twin variant is currently being designed. Images show a design with an anti-aircraft sight coupled with a holographic sight. The twin variant shown in the pictures is suitable for use on platforms such as RHIBs, patrol vessels and utility or scout helicopters. This twin configuration could also be modified for use on fixed-wing aircraft or mounted on attack helicopters. It could also be used on ground vehicles for protection from low-flying aircraft or saturation fire on enemy positions.

The M2F is expected to enter the Turkish Armed Forces inventory soon. A number of nations have expressed their interest in the product, and sales are expected after full production commences

The post Canik To Produce 950 Round Per Minute HMG Along With Surprise Twin Version first appeared on DefenceHub.